Fitz File

         With the two-year anniversary of the infamous Dobbs decision on June 24, I wanted to revisit just how impactful it was. Because of “trigger laws” in multiple states, the second the decision was announced, women began to suffer. Since then, the steady barrage of horror stories has galvanized the public to support the right to choose even further than it already was two years ago.   A similar alarm that rose from this decision came not from Justice Alito’s majority opinion, but Justice Thomas’ concurrence.  His words led all who read them to come to the horrifying conclusion that this new conservative supermajority on the court, in combination with the broader Trump movement, meant every single piece of societal progress was now on the table.         There is a principle in the law called stare decisis , a Latin phrase literally meaning “to stand by things decided.”   In the legal field, we us...

            There is a grim reality for certain areas of our political discourse. While it isn’t exactly apathy, it does result in the same thing: a collective shrug. Were you aware there were four mass shootings yesterday (June 9th)? I wasn’t. Twenty one people were injured. Families shattered, lives broken, communities traumatized. And almost nothing happens. While there are many factors that contribute to this attitude, Republican talking points are a significant part in American inaction. It is easy to see because it is seen over and over and over again: “This is not the time”, “it won’t end gun violence”, “second amendment”, “they’re coming to take your guns”, “its videogames”, “its mental health”. While this kind of rhetoric is toxically effective, it is thankfully limited to only a few issues. However, the hipper-conservative Republican Party is currently trying to spread it to their biggest liability: women’s rights.  ...

          The 2016 election changed Democrat’s attitude when it comes to predicting and confidence.  While we have always been the party of nervous nerds who want to think of clever ways to solve problems for the betterment of the country, the defeat of Hilary Clinton has scarred us.  This has led to underplaying victories and hedging our bets in ways that might be detrimental to voter turnout, though every election since 2016 has proven this wrong.  But with the South Carolina primary wrapped up, this trauma also seems to be influencing how we talk about the strengths and weaknesses of Donald Trump.            I am not sure why I have not seen more commentators highlighting just how weak Trump is in the Republican party.  There have been four competitions so far for the GOP, Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, and now South Carolina.  Other than Iowa, I have not seen anyone seriously think Trump would n...

          With the Iowa caucuses just a few days away, there has been a uptick in voter analysis. Along with this is a renewal in the question “how could anyone vote for Donald Trump?” While that has always been a question since 2016, there are several fairly extreme examples which continue to press this question, not the least of which was his latest claim that he should be immune from killing political rivals as President. But given there will be around 150 million people voting in the election, it is useful to divide these groups into broad categories to understand how they view certain issues. Over the past few months, I have broken Trump voters into 5 general categories. While these can overlap somewhat, they are important distinctions to use when deciding on a persuasive methodology.           True Believers. This is the group of ride-or-die (literally) Trump voters. They have the red hat, travel to attend his ra...

            It is an unfortunate trend of our discourse that the accusation of hypocrisy no longer has the effectiveness it once held. To see someone preach morals, fiscal responsibility, or social beliefs, only to be exposed as a hypocrite used to demean their character in the public eye, and thus lessen their ability to wield power. But with the rise of social media, and extreme political beliefs, the fact that some people do not practice what they preach has led to a depressing moral equivalency that is anything but true.           I was exposed, once again, to a particularly frustrating brand of hypocrisy earlier today when I read about State Farm Insurance no longer accepting applications for homes in California due to high-risk issues draining their coffers. While this is a perfectly sensible move from a business-sense, it is a disaster for individual homeowners, the state, and economic strength as a whole. I beg...

            What I enjoy the most about reading Presidential biographies is the glimpse it provides into the lives of truly great people.  The United States has been an exceptional country from the moment of our inception in 1788.  The leaders of this country have been proud examples of hardworking, considerate, and intelligent individuals to match this exceptionalism.  On top of the hard powers of the office, the President also has incredible influence on the national mood and predominate values of the country.  Even in tiny ways, JFK was the first President to not wear a hat to his inauguration, and after, the national style for men lost the hat.  FDR said the office is “pre-eminently a place of moral leadership”, and when those holders do not live up to the moral responsibility, it tends to degrade the entire nation.  Unfortunately, this piece is about three Presidents who have had the most majo...

                    While I try to keep my posts factual and center the argument around introductions of policy, today I want to rant about morality. This inspiration came from two books I had finished this week, His Truth is Marching On: John Lewis and the Power of Hope by Jon Meacham, and Grace: President Obama and Ten Days in the Battle for America by Cody Keenan. While both are incredible stories in history of actions taken by an impassioned civil rights leader and inspired speech writer respectively, these books highlighted the continued moral struggle of America.  Their stories, battles, and beliefs are why I love this country.  Both stories made the fights of the past a framing device for the struggles of the present.  That we are fighting now was not an indictment of our society, but an ongoing symbol of the transforming America.  The struggle itself is the true representation: we are not perfect,...